ActionElections 2025ReportsRepressionSmear

Legal Warning to Those Echoing Freiman / Drulis Slanderous Police Accusation of a Felony – Update – Drulis – Freiman Follower Recants Malicious False Bribery Accusation

Update: After explaining to the perpetrator of this smear that it is slander to accuse someone of a felony without evidence or facts, they reworded to a more normal comment – disagreeing with my style. Hopedully this will serve as an example to others who might follow the harmful example of Freiman and Drulis – making maliciously false felony accusations against their political opponent and IHRA opponent. However the repentant person did not take me up on my plea that she pressure her candidates to correct the damages they are causing me with their malicious and false felony accusation for which I still might be charged!

It seems one of the supporters of the Freiman / Drulis campaign has accused me of bribery in a Facebook comment. I am not convicted and at this point not even charged of any crime in relation to the slanderous police accusation made by Freiman to Montgomery Police. On Tuesday in a letter, Mitchelle Drulis confirmed her involvement also in the filing of the false felony accusation. Drulis stated in the letter:

We contacted legal counsel regarding the incident, and it was recommended that we have the incident on record with law enforcement.

So Drulis collaborated with Freiman in the proffering of a false felony accusation to the Montgomery Police and we have a record of her participation from her letter to Lisa Hassan. I am glad this evidence has been obtained. Should I be indicted and then cleared I would be compelled to seek legal accountabilty from all participants and that is certainly inclusive of Drulis by her own revelation in her letter. I have not been charged. The threat of a false charge is still being held over my head into the 4th week since the police visit they initiatied to my home based on their false accusation of a felony. The police report has not been released to me and that is quite unusual. I am told by Montgomery Police that the reason for the long delay of the police report’s release is because the OAG is considering charging me.

In her letter to Lisa Hassan, Drulis also expressed interest in a dialogue. We have an idea now what she has in mind since the next day, yesterday Wednesday April 9, one of her supporters started echoing Freiman’s false accusation of a felony in social medai. So these are damages of the slander that I am starting to incur. Of course all of my experience is publicly documented at FightBackBetter – a clear legal record. The kind of dialogue Drulis wants is to have her supporters echo a false accusation of a felony against me in social media apparently.

The third person who falsely accused me of the felony crime of ‘bribery’ did so on social media – on Facebook. Under a postng about “Ethnic Cleansing” by Seth Kaper – Dale I posted a link to Lisa Hassan’s letter responding to the Drulis letter she received.

An apparent supporter of Drulis and Freiman rebutted my posting with an accusation of bribery. I truncated the person’s name. This was her posting:

How do I know this person is a Drulis supporter? She has a picture of her from the recent Princeton Hands Off rally on her Facebook site. That is not conclusive proof of course but that plus her comment does suggest as much.

As far as this person’s comment that I should be honest and state the truth that other pro-Palestine supporters were at the event – I have reported that multiple times at FightBackBetter. They were there on their own not coordinated to me. I understand one told them they would not sign their petition over IHRA. Perfectly legit protected free speech. I did the same thing – I said I would hold support from them over IHRA by running against them if they stay on the bill. Leveraging my political rights toward pressure to stop a fascist bill. This person leveraged their right to sign or not sign a petition – I was leveraging my right to run or not run in challenge to them. The bribery false accusation that Freiman made with Drulis admitted participation – if that case was made and I were to be convicted – it could create precedent and make a felony of not only what I did but what those other 9 people did – leveraging our political power to vote, to sign a petition or to run for office toward objectives – in this case stopping a fascist law Drulis and Freiman support. If it is illegal in Freiman – Drulis world to leverage a candidacy it is also illegal to leverage a vote or petition signature. That is the slippery slope we are on with the dangerous false police accusation by Freiman and Drulis and now being echoed by their supporter. It is also quite preposterous and fascist.

There is nothing wrong with a voter saying:

I will not vote for you if you are on the IHRA bill.

I will not sign your petition because you are on the IHRA bill.

I will run against you if you keep your name on the IHRA bill.

All legal per our right to vote, our right to sign petitions or not sign them as a voter and our right to run for office or not run for office – for any reason and we are allowed to say the reason – it is not bribery. All of it is protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

If you let politicians decay your brain with false lawfare felony accusations -you are a stool pigeon for fascism and you will likely sit back and say nothing for example – while students are disappeared off the streets.

This posting serves notice to the person who made the slanderous post accusing me of a felony and the two politicians – Roy Freiman who made the false police report against me and Mitchelle Drulis who admitted that she participated in bringing the complaint in her recent reply letter.

This posting also serves notice to all others who want to jump on the Drulis – Freiman Smear Wagon and echo their false felony accusation of bribery. It is a total lie and if you tell it – you could some day be held accountable.

Best case scenario: The police report is released immediately and the accusation is dismissed without cause. I can then assess the damages I have been made to bear thus far and decide legal steps.

But if they move this forward and I do get charged – if they do not convict – the damages will be greater and at that point the assessment will be no brainer – all responsible parties will be brought to legal count for persecuting me with a false felony accusation.